[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
اصول اخلاق نشریه::
اصول اخلاق نشریه::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 21, Issue 84 (Spring 1404 2025) ::
QEER 2025, 21(84): 235-266 Back to browse issues page
comparison of single-objective (GA) and multi-objective (NSGA-II) optimization methods in optimizing Iran's electricity generation portfolio.
Ali Asghar Esmaeelinia ketabi *1 , Zahra Pourkhaghan Shahrezaei , Marjan Danan Keshideh
1- , aeketabi@gmail.com
Abstract:   (33 Views)

The ease of converting electricity into other energies has caused human activities to be highly dependent on it. Environmental issues, limited resources, unfair distribution of resources and the strong dependence of countries' economies on energy have caused more attention to be paid to optimizing the mix of electricity producing resources. Also, different goals are proposed in policy-making and comprehensive planning, which are in conflict with each other; so It’s important to optimize the composition of the energy production portfolio based on what purpose. In this research, the electricity generation portfolio is a combination of fossil, renewable and nuclear energy groups, and optimization is done using the genetic algorithm method with MATLAB software in single-objective (GA) and multi-objective (NSGA-II) modes.
The comparison of optimization methods showed that the share of energies for single-objective optimization based on economic index is different from modes based on environmental index and Multi-purpose optimization. Through multi-objective optimization, a set of solutions is introduced, each of which fulfills one of the objectives at an acceptable level. In other words, achieving general optimal points is more likely than single-objective mode. single-objective optimization usually introduces local optimal points and leads to misguidance and moving away from the main goal.
 

Keywords: genetic algorithm, single-objective optimization, multi-objective optimization, electric energy portfolio
Full-Text [PDF 1621 kb]   (10 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Thesis(PhD.) | Subject: Energy Economic
Received: 2023/12/8 | Accepted: 2025/05/31 | Published: 2025/05/31 | ePublished: 2025/05/31
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Esmaeelinia ketabi A A, Pourkhaghan Shahrezaei Z, Danan Keshideh M. comparison of single-objective (GA) and multi-objective (NSGA-II) optimization methods in optimizing Iran's electricity generation portfolio.. QEER 2025; 21 (84) :235-266
URL: http://iiesj.ir/article-1-1605-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 21, Issue 84 (Spring 1404 2025) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصاد انرژی Quarterly Energy Economics Review
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4692